NanoBeadMillwet grinding
Coatings & Ink

Pigment Dispersion Equipment — From Agglomerate to a Stable Sub-Micron Dispersion

If the fineness is right out of the mill and wrong by morning, you do not have a grinding problem. Here is how to tell which of the three steps is failing.

Free grinding test available · reply within 24 h · no obligation

Jump to the troubleshooting table
Organic and inorganic pigmentsCarbon black programmesSolvent and water-based

The real challenge: it is not grinding, it is de-agglomeration plus stabilisation

A carbon black pigment may have a primary particle size of 20 – 50 nm. By the time it reaches your plant, it exists as agglomerates of 10 – 100 µm. You are not making particles smaller. You are breaking clumps apart, and then keeping them apart.

That is three distinct steps, and only the second one is a grinding problem:

  1. Wetting — displacing air and moisture from the pigment surface with resin/solvent. If wetting is incomplete, no amount of grinding will fix the result.
  2. De-agglomeration — mechanical breakdown of agglomerates. This is where the bead mill does its work.
  3. Stabilisation — keeping the separated particles from re-clumping. This is a formulation problem, solved with the right dispersant at the right loading.

The most common failure we see: a customer hits target fineness in the mill and loses it in the let-down tank. That is a stabilisation failure, not a grinding failure — and buying a bigger mill will not fix it.

Organic vs. inorganic: different strategies

Organic (phthalocyanine blue, azo red, quinacridone)Inorganic (titanium dioxide, iron oxide, carbon black)
Primary particleVery fine, 20 – 100 nmCoarser, 200 – 500 nm
AgglomerationSevere — hard, tightly bound aggregatesModerate — softer agglomerates
Energy requiredHighModerate to high (carbon black excepted)
Heat sensitivityHigh — many organic pigments degrade or shift shade above 60 – 70 °C Low
Typical targetD90 200 nm – 1 µmD90 1 – 15 µm
Key riskOver-grinding reduces colour strength and shifts shadeUnder-dispersion causes haze, poor gloss, low tint strength

Carbon black deserves a special note. It has an extremely high surface area and forms very strong agglomerates. It typically needs two or three passes and more energy per unit than any other common pigment. If you are running carbon black, tell us up front — it changes the media, the separator and the cooling specification.

Recommended equipment by production scale

ScaleThroughputRecommendedNotes
R&D / formulation0.5 – 5 L batchPM-L lab mill, or basket mill for screeningBasket mill is ideal for screening many formulations quickly
Pilot / small production10 – 100 L/hPM-N5 / PM-N15Same media and tip speed as production — so results scale
Production100 – 800 L/hPM-N30 / PM-N60 / PM-N150Continuous, with recirculation for tighter distribution
Pre-dispersionBatchHigh-shear disperserDo the rough work first — it roughly halves the load on the mill

A practical point: the cheapest way to increase mill throughput is usually a better pre-dispersion step, not a bigger mill.

Target fineness by application

ApplicationTypical D90 targetWhy
Automotive basecoat< 1 µmGloss, DOI, colour travel
Industrial / general coatings< 10 – 15 µmHiding power without over-grinding
Gravure and flexo ink< 5 µmPrintability, no nozzle or doctor blade wear
Inkjet pigment concentrate< 200 nmNozzle diameter, jetting reliability
Plastic masterbatch< 2 – 5 µmDispersion in the carrier resin
Transparent iron oxide< 100 nmTransparency depends on staying below the visible threshold
Troubleshooting

Common problems and what actually causes them

This is the table most people come to this page for. If it helps, it also tells you what kind of supplier you are talking to.

SymptomMost likely causeFix
Fineness is fine in the mill, coarser next morning Stabilisation failure — dispersant type or loading Reformulate; do not increase grinding energy
Colour strength drops as you grind finer Over-grinding — particle size below optimum for that pigment Reduce passes / increase feed rate; target is not "as fine as possible"
Shade shifts during grinding Temperature too high, or over-grinding Improve cooling; reduce tip speed
Viscosity climbs during the pass Temperature rise, or solvent loss Check cooling; check chamber pressure
Separator blocks Media fracture, or media too large for the gap Replace media; check fill rate and wear
Batch-to-batch variation Inconsistent media charge, or inconsistent pre-dispersion Weigh media charge; standardise the pre-mix step

Process parameters that actually matter

ParameterTypical rangeWhat goes wrong
Media size0.1 – 1.0 mmToo large → cannot reach target; too small → slow, hot, expensive
Tip speed8 – 15 m/s Too low → no energy transfer; too high → heat, media wear, shade shift
Media fill70 – 85%Too low → poor contact; too high → heat build-up
Product temperature< 60 °C for organicsOverheating → degradation, shade shift, viscosity change
Number of passes1 – 4Single pass gives broader distribution than recirculation
Dispersant loadingFormula-specificUnder-dosed → re-agglomeration; over-dosed → cost, foaming
Next step

Tell us what you are dispersing — we'll recommend a setup within 24 hours.

Send 1 kg of your mill base and we will run it, measure it, and return the D10 / D50 / D90 report plus our recommendation on media and number of passes.